<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://7thprovince.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://7thprovince.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inner Story by C Long</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/inner-story/comment-page-1/#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator>C Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=2129#comment-3948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was half-joking about Twilight. Beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. And, of course, the idea that because something is popular that means it&#039;s great is highly debatable. I often think there is, in fact, an inverse relationship. 

But that&#039;s rather beside the point. What I was getting at was that automatically attributing the mystery of the creative process to a divine source is an error in reasoning. Here&#039;s why I say that. 

Again and again throughout the ascent of humans as sentient beings the mysteries of the natural world have been demystified. There was a time, not that long ago, when it was understood that the sun was a divine being, an intelligent force, a God, by pretty much every human on the planet. The particulars of the Sun God varied widely, but at the time that was our best explanation for the mystery of this fiery orb that ruled the planet. But the sun has been demystified, and only the most primitive people today, those still stuck in the Ancient Ways (ignorance) of pre-history, believe such a notion.

Over and over again man has increased his understanding of the natural world and divine explanations have fallen by the wayside. So why cling to divine explanations for today&#039;s remaining mysteries? Such thinking ignores man&#039;s entire history of continual, ongoing Enlightenment. 

The creative process is indeed a mystery, as are so many other cognitive functions. By the same token, myriad cognitive processes which were just as mysterious only decades ago are now well understood. As time goes by, we will continue, inexorably, to demystify the human brain. Given this long history of discovery, isn&#039;t it much more likely that, though currently mysterious, the creative process is a completely natural process, something our remarkable human brains are wired to do? 

Where do our stories come from? I maintain that every single one comes from &quot;in here&quot;, our uniquely human imagination. So why is it that some stories seem much more complete to us, as though they have already been created and we are merely taking dictation? Who knows? That&#039;s part of what we don&#039;t yet understand. But don&#039;t you find it interesting that these remarkable &quot;gift stories&quot; are unique to us as individuals? That is, they always seem to bear our personal signatures. They are never in a foreign language, for one thing. And they never seem to contain vocabulary that is unknown to us. And they are invariably built up from the scaffolding or our own personal experiences, interests, obsessions, special knowledge, artistic preferences, inclinations, etc. 

You mentioned JKR. HP &quot;came&quot; to her because of all those parts of what make up the unique human JKR coalescing into her personal vision of a compelling story. But HP is certainly not something completely new on this earth. Magic, YA lit, British boarding schools, the Chosen One, and on an on, she didn&#039;t create these elements. Her brilliance was in blending them in a new way.

Ultimately I just think the idea that there is some divine source picking and choosing which writers will be given which stories to write is a lot more problematic, on so many levels, that the idea that all stories evolve out of the many things that make humans human: our unlimited imagination, our social need to communicate, our self-awareness, our curiosity, our sense of wonder, our contemplation of life and death. All of which emanate, quite simply, from the completely natural processes of the remarkable human brain. I think it&#039;s okay to take some credit for our ideas. Because they come from us, they are unique to us. I couldn&#039;t write your books, and you couldn&#039;t write mine. And that&#039;s a beautiful thing, and exactly as it should be.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3948&#039;,&#039;C Long&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3948&#039;,&#039;C Long&#039;,&#039;I was half-joking about Twilight. Beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. And, of course, the idea that because something is popular that means it\&#039;s great is highly debatable. I often think there is, in fact, an inverse relationship. \r\n\r\nBut that\&#039;s rather beside the point. What I was getting at was that automatically attributing the mystery of the creative process to a divine source is an error in reasoning. Here\&#039;s why I say that. \r\n\r\nAgain and again throughout the ascent of humans as sentient beings the mysteries of the natural world have been demystified. There was a time, not that long ago, when it was understood that the sun was a divine being, an intelligent force, a God, by pretty much every human on the planet. The particulars of the Sun God varied widely, but at the time that was our best explanation for the mystery of this fiery orb that ruled the planet. But the sun has been demystified, and only the most primitive people today, those still stuck in the Ancient Ways (ignorance) of pre-history, believe such a notion.\r\n\r\nOver and over again man has increased his understanding of the natural world and divine explanations have fallen by the wayside. So why cling to divine explanations for today\&#039;s remaining mysteries? Such thinking ignores man\&#039;s entire history of continual, ongoing Enlightenment. \r\n\r\nThe creative process is indeed a mystery, as are so many other cognitive functions. By the same token, myriad cognitive processes which were just as mysterious only decades ago are now well understood. As time goes by, we will continue, inexorably, to demystify the human brain. Given this long history of discovery, isn\&#039;t it much more likely that, though currently mysterious, the creative process is a completely natural process, something our remarkable human brains are wired to do? \r\n\r\nWhere do our stories come from? I maintain that every single one comes from \&quot;in here\&quot;, our uniquely human imagination. So why is it that some stories seem much more complete to us, as though they have already been created and we are merely taking dictation? Who knows? That\&#039;s part of what we don\&#039;t yet understand. But don\&#039;t you find it interesting that these remarkable \&quot;gift stories\&quot; are unique to us as individuals? That is, they always seem to bear our personal signatures. They are never in a foreign language, for one thing. And they never seem to contain vocabulary that is unknown to us. And they are invariably built up from the scaffolding or our own personal experiences, interests, obsessions, special knowledge, artistic preferences, inclinations, etc. \r\n\r\nYou mentioned JKR. HP \&quot;came\&quot; to her because of all those parts of what make up the unique human JKR coalescing into her personal vision of a compelling story. But HP is certainly not something completely new on this earth. Magic, YA lit, British boarding schools, the Chosen One, and on an on, she didn\&#039;t create these elements. Her brilliance was in blending them in a new way.\r\n\r\nUltimately I just think the idea that there is some divine source picking and choosing which writers will be given which stories to write is a lot more problematic, on so many levels, that the idea that all stories evolve out of the many things that make humans human: our unlimited imagination, our social need to communicate, our self-awareness, our curiosity, our sense of wonder, our contemplation of life and death. All of which emanate, quite simply, from the completely natural processes of the remarkable human brain. I think it\&#039;s okay to take some credit for our ideas. Because they come from us, they are unique to us. I couldn\&#039;t write your books, and you couldn\&#039;t write mine. And that\&#039;s a beautiful thing, and exactly as it should be.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was half-joking about Twilight. Beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. And, of course, the idea that because something is popular that means it&#8217;s great is highly debatable. I often think there is, in fact, an inverse relationship. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s rather beside the point. What I was getting at was that automatically attributing the mystery of the creative process to a divine source is an error in reasoning. Here&#8217;s why I say that. </p>
<p>Again and again throughout the ascent of humans as sentient beings the mysteries of the natural world have been demystified. There was a time, not that long ago, when it was understood that the sun was a divine being, an intelligent force, a God, by pretty much every human on the planet. The particulars of the Sun God varied widely, but at the time that was our best explanation for the mystery of this fiery orb that ruled the planet. But the sun has been demystified, and only the most primitive people today, those still stuck in the Ancient Ways (ignorance) of pre-history, believe such a notion.</p>
<p>Over and over again man has increased his understanding of the natural world and divine explanations have fallen by the wayside. So why cling to divine explanations for today&#8217;s remaining mysteries? Such thinking ignores man&#8217;s entire history of continual, ongoing Enlightenment. </p>
<p>The creative process is indeed a mystery, as are so many other cognitive functions. By the same token, myriad cognitive processes which were just as mysterious only decades ago are now well understood. As time goes by, we will continue, inexorably, to demystify the human brain. Given this long history of discovery, isn&#8217;t it much more likely that, though currently mysterious, the creative process is a completely natural process, something our remarkable human brains are wired to do? </p>
<p>Where do our stories come from? I maintain that every single one comes from &#8220;in here&#8221;, our uniquely human imagination. So why is it that some stories seem much more complete to us, as though they have already been created and we are merely taking dictation? Who knows? That&#8217;s part of what we don&#8217;t yet understand. But don&#8217;t you find it interesting that these remarkable &#8220;gift stories&#8221; are unique to us as individuals? That is, they always seem to bear our personal signatures. They are never in a foreign language, for one thing. And they never seem to contain vocabulary that is unknown to us. And they are invariably built up from the scaffolding or our own personal experiences, interests, obsessions, special knowledge, artistic preferences, inclinations, etc. </p>
<p>You mentioned JKR. HP &#8220;came&#8221; to her because of all those parts of what make up the unique human JKR coalescing into her personal vision of a compelling story. But HP is certainly not something completely new on this earth. Magic, YA lit, British boarding schools, the Chosen One, and on an on, she didn&#8217;t create these elements. Her brilliance was in blending them in a new way.</p>
<p>Ultimately I just think the idea that there is some divine source picking and choosing which writers will be given which stories to write is a lot more problematic, on so many levels, that the idea that all stories evolve out of the many things that make humans human: our unlimited imagination, our social need to communicate, our self-awareness, our curiosity, our sense of wonder, our contemplation of life and death. All of which emanate, quite simply, from the completely natural processes of the remarkable human brain. I think it&#8217;s okay to take some credit for our ideas. Because they come from us, they are unique to us. I couldn&#8217;t write your books, and you couldn&#8217;t write mine. And that&#8217;s a beautiful thing, and exactly as it should be.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3948','C Long'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3948','C Long','I was half-joking about Twilight. Beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. And, of course, the idea that because something is popular that means it\'s great is highly debatable. I often think there is, in fact, an inverse relationship. \r\n\r\nBut that\'s rather beside the point. What I was getting at was that automatically attributing the mystery of the creative process to a divine source is an error in reasoning. Here\'s why I say that. \r\n\r\nAgain and again throughout the ascent of humans as sentient beings the mysteries of the natural world have been demystified. There was a time, not that long ago, when it was understood that the sun was a divine being, an intelligent force, a God, by pretty much every human on the planet. The particulars of the Sun God varied widely, but at the time that was our best explanation for the mystery of this fiery orb that ruled the planet. But the sun has been demystified, and only the most primitive people today, those still stuck in the Ancient Ways (ignorance) of pre-history, believe such a notion.\r\n\r\nOver and over again man has increased his understanding of the natural world and divine explanations have fallen by the wayside. So why cling to divine explanations for today\'s remaining mysteries? Such thinking ignores man\'s entire history of continual, ongoing Enlightenment. \r\n\r\nThe creative process is indeed a mystery, as are so many other cognitive functions. By the same token, myriad cognitive processes which were just as mysterious only decades ago are now well understood. As time goes by, we will continue, inexorably, to demystify the human brain. Given this long history of discovery, isn\'t it much more likely that, though currently mysterious, the creative process is a completely natural process, something our remarkable human brains are wired to do? \r\n\r\nWhere do our stories come from? I maintain that every single one comes from \&quot;in here\&quot;, our uniquely human imagination. So why is it that some stories seem much more complete to us, as though they have already been created and we are merely taking dictation? Who knows? That\'s part of what we don\'t yet understand. But don\'t you find it interesting that these remarkable \&quot;gift stories\&quot; are unique to us as individuals? That is, they always seem to bear our personal signatures. They are never in a foreign language, for one thing. And they never seem to contain vocabulary that is unknown to us. And they are invariably built up from the scaffolding or our own personal experiences, interests, obsessions, special knowledge, artistic preferences, inclinations, etc. \r\n\r\nYou mentioned JKR. HP \&quot;came\&quot; to her because of all those parts of what make up the unique human JKR coalescing into her personal vision of a compelling story. But HP is certainly not something completely new on this earth. Magic, YA lit, British boarding schools, the Chosen One, and on an on, she didn\'t create these elements. Her brilliance was in blending them in a new way.\r\n\r\nUltimately I just think the idea that there is some divine source picking and choosing which writers will be given which stories to write is a lot more problematic, on so many levels, that the idea that all stories evolve out of the many things that make humans human: our unlimited imagination, our social need to communicate, our self-awareness, our curiosity, our sense of wonder, our contemplation of life and death. All of which emanate, quite simply, from the completely natural processes of the remarkable human brain. I think it\'s okay to take some credit for our ideas. Because they come from us, they are unique to us. I couldn\'t write your books, and you couldn\'t write mine. And that\'s a beautiful thing, and exactly as it should be.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inner Story by Jimmy Ng</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/inner-story/comment-page-1/#comment-3944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=2129#comment-3944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twilight is actually a great book.  I wrote about this on this site and here&#039;s why I think it&#039;s a great book. It&#039;s a page turner. Now, you may say the writing, storytelling, character development, (input any other writing technique), sucks. Stephen King has. Nonetheless, almost every single person who&#039;ve read those books could not stop turning the page, put the book down, and were compelled to finish the series. Isn&#039;t that what we as writers want? 

Think about it. Reading a book is a huge investment. It&#039;s not like watching a movie, where we spend two hours in a theater and that&#039;s it. We can risk watching crap movies. Risking reading crappy long books? Less likely. 

I guess I worded things different. When people talk about God, soul, purpose, passion, paths in life, we may be talking about one thing, living a guided life. Basically, we as people have gifts. Whether we choose to share them or not is individual. But these gifts start in the formless, what you termed as out there. We as humans can bring them into the form: bridges, skyscrapers, children, books, government, etc. Everything man made started out as an idea. It&#039;s impossible to know whether we are responsible or if some divine force helped us create these ideas. I can tell you, in my own experience, and what I&#039;ve read from others like Arthur Miller, Robin Williams, Stephanie Meyers, and even the great Joanne Rowling have had the stories &#039;given&#039; to them, stories chose them, or some how that idea fell into their laps. However you want to word it. My story that I&#039;m writing definitely fell into my lap and has never let me go, despite my efforts. The way it germinated and matured has surprised me to no end. It&#039;s one of the very few things that I truly love and keeps me going, aside from my survival instincts. I am human. 

One last thing, this is just a response to your comment, which I completely appreciate. And this is in no way to dispute your experiences and opinions, and I write these posts from my own experiences only. I can&#039;t really comment on others experiences, since they are their own.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3944&#039;,&#039;Jimmy Ng&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3944&#039;,&#039;Jimmy Ng&#039;,&#039;Twilight is actually a great book.  I wrote about this on this site and here\&#039;s why I think it\&#039;s a great book. It\&#039;s a page turner. Now, you may say the writing, storytelling, character development, (input any other writing technique), sucks. Stephen King has. Nonetheless, almost every single person who\&#039;ve read those books could not stop turning the page, put the book down, and were compelled to finish the series. Isn\&#039;t that what we as writers want? \r\n\r\nThink about it. Reading a book is a huge investment. It\&#039;s not like watching a movie, where we spend two hours in a theater and that\&#039;s it. We can risk watching crap movies. Risking reading crappy long books? Less likely. \r\n\r\nI guess I worded things different. When people talk about God, soul, purpose, passion, paths in life, we may be talking about one thing, living a guided life. Basically, we as people have gifts. Whether we choose to share them or not is individual. But these gifts start in the formless, what you termed as out there. We as humans can bring them into the form: bridges, skyscrapers, children, books, government, etc. Everything man made started out as an idea. It\&#039;s impossible to know whether we are responsible or if some divine force helped us create these ideas. I can tell you, in my own experience, and what I\&#039;ve read from others like Arthur Miller, Robin Williams, Stephanie Meyers, and even the great Joanne Rowling have had the stories \&#039;given\&#039; to them, stories chose them, or some how that idea fell into their laps. However you want to word it. My story that I\&#039;m writing definitely fell into my lap and has never let me go, despite my efforts. The way it germinated and matured has surprised me to no end. It\&#039;s one of the very few things that I truly love and keeps me going, aside from my survival instincts. I am human. \r\n\r\nOne last thing, this is just a response to your comment, which I completely appreciate. And this is in no way to dispute your experiences and opinions, and I write these posts from my own experiences only. I can\&#039;t really comment on others experiences, since they are their own.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twilight is actually a great book.  I wrote about this on this site and here&#8217;s why I think it&#8217;s a great book. It&#8217;s a page turner. Now, you may say the writing, storytelling, character development, (input any other writing technique), sucks. Stephen King has. Nonetheless, almost every single person who&#8217;ve read those books could not stop turning the page, put the book down, and were compelled to finish the series. Isn&#8217;t that what we as writers want? </p>
<p>Think about it. Reading a book is a huge investment. It&#8217;s not like watching a movie, where we spend two hours in a theater and that&#8217;s it. We can risk watching crap movies. Risking reading crappy long books? Less likely. </p>
<p>I guess I worded things different. When people talk about God, soul, purpose, passion, paths in life, we may be talking about one thing, living a guided life. Basically, we as people have gifts. Whether we choose to share them or not is individual. But these gifts start in the formless, what you termed as out there. We as humans can bring them into the form: bridges, skyscrapers, children, books, government, etc. Everything man made started out as an idea. It&#8217;s impossible to know whether we are responsible or if some divine force helped us create these ideas. I can tell you, in my own experience, and what I&#8217;ve read from others like Arthur Miller, Robin Williams, Stephanie Meyers, and even the great Joanne Rowling have had the stories &#8216;given&#8217; to them, stories chose them, or some how that idea fell into their laps. However you want to word it. My story that I&#8217;m writing definitely fell into my lap and has never let me go, despite my efforts. The way it germinated and matured has surprised me to no end. It&#8217;s one of the very few things that I truly love and keeps me going, aside from my survival instincts. I am human. </p>
<p>One last thing, this is just a response to your comment, which I completely appreciate. And this is in no way to dispute your experiences and opinions, and I write these posts from my own experiences only. I can&#8217;t really comment on others experiences, since they are their own.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3944','Jimmy Ng'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3944','Jimmy Ng','Twilight is actually a great book.  I wrote about this on this site and here\'s why I think it\'s a great book. It\'s a page turner. Now, you may say the writing, storytelling, character development, (input any other writing technique), sucks. Stephen King has. Nonetheless, almost every single person who\'ve read those books could not stop turning the page, put the book down, and were compelled to finish the series. Isn\'t that what we as writers want? \r\n\r\nThink about it. Reading a book is a huge investment. It\'s not like watching a movie, where we spend two hours in a theater and that\'s it. We can risk watching crap movies. Risking reading crappy long books? Less likely. \r\n\r\nI guess I worded things different. When people talk about God, soul, purpose, passion, paths in life, we may be talking about one thing, living a guided life. Basically, we as people have gifts. Whether we choose to share them or not is individual. But these gifts start in the formless, what you termed as out there. We as humans can bring them into the form: bridges, skyscrapers, children, books, government, etc. Everything man made started out as an idea. It\'s impossible to know whether we are responsible or if some divine force helped us create these ideas. I can tell you, in my own experience, and what I\'ve read from others like Arthur Miller, Robin Williams, Stephanie Meyers, and even the great Joanne Rowling have had the stories \'given\' to them, stories chose them, or some how that idea fell into their laps. However you want to word it. My story that I\'m writing definitely fell into my lap and has never let me go, despite my efforts. The way it germinated and matured has surprised me to no end. It\'s one of the very few things that I truly love and keeps me going, aside from my survival instincts. I am human. \r\n\r\nOne last thing, this is just a response to your comment, which I completely appreciate. And this is in no way to dispute your experiences and opinions, and I write these posts from my own experiences only. I can\'t really comment on others experiences, since they are their own.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inner Story by C Long</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/inner-story/comment-page-1/#comment-3940</link>
		<dc:creator>C Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=2129#comment-3940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the exact genesis of stories is mysterious, it&#039;s not divine. All humans are creative. Our unique genetic code determines our proclivities. Some people are storytellers, most are not.

There is no place &quot;out there&quot; where stories reside, waiting for specially selected individuals to reveal them. They always come from inside us, our personal vision. 

If they came from a &quot;divine source&quot;, how would you explain &quot;Twilight&quot;?&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3940&#039;,&#039;C Long&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3940&#039;,&#039;C Long&#039;,&#039;While the exact genesis of stories is mysterious, it\&#039;s not divine. All humans are creative. Our unique genetic code determines our proclivities. Some people are storytellers, most are not.\r\n\r\nThere is no place \&quot;out there\&quot; where stories reside, waiting for specially selected individuals to reveal them. They always come from inside us, our personal vision. \r\n\r\nIf they came from a \&quot;divine source\&quot;, how would you explain \&quot;Twilight\&quot;?&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the exact genesis of stories is mysterious, it&#8217;s not divine. All humans are creative. Our unique genetic code determines our proclivities. Some people are storytellers, most are not.</p>
<p>There is no place &#8220;out there&#8221; where stories reside, waiting for specially selected individuals to reveal them. They always come from inside us, our personal vision. </p>
<p>If they came from a &#8220;divine source&#8221;, how would you explain &#8220;Twilight&#8221;?
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3940','C Long'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3940','C Long','While the exact genesis of stories is mysterious, it\'s not divine. All humans are creative. Our unique genetic code determines our proclivities. Some people are storytellers, most are not.\r\n\r\nThere is no place \&quot;out there\&quot; where stories reside, waiting for specially selected individuals to reveal them. They always come from inside us, our personal vision. \r\n\r\nIf they came from a \&quot;divine source\&quot;, how would you explain \&quot;Twilight\&quot;?'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slice of Heaven by Chris Long</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/slice-of-heaven/comment-page-1/#comment-3915</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 04:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=2101#comment-3915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Jimmy. I haven&#039;t seen any comments for a while on your posts and I just wanted to let you know that I, for one, very much enjoy reading what you put up here. I hope I&#039;m not the only one. So don&#039;t give up on it (if you were possibly considering doing that).

And I totally agree with your observations here about &quot;writing what you know&quot;. Hell, I&#039;ve never heard a satisfying explanation of what that even means. Like in my book: Am I supposed to murder someone so I can write about my MC murdering someone? Really? 

All I can say is this: Write On, Friend!&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3915&#039;,&#039;Chris Long&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3915&#039;,&#039;Chris Long&#039;,&#039;Hi, Jimmy. I haven\&#039;t seen any comments for a while on your posts and I just wanted to let you know that I, for one, very much enjoy reading what you put up here. I hope I\&#039;m not the only one. So don\&#039;t give up on it (if you were possibly considering doing that).\r\n\r\nAnd I totally agree with your observations here about \&quot;writing what you know\&quot;. Hell, I\&#039;ve never heard a satisfying explanation of what that even means. Like in my book: Am I supposed to murder someone so I can write about my MC murdering someone? Really? \r\n\r\nAll I can say is this: Write On, Friend!&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jimmy. I haven&#8217;t seen any comments for a while on your posts and I just wanted to let you know that I, for one, very much enjoy reading what you put up here. I hope I&#8217;m not the only one. So don&#8217;t give up on it (if you were possibly considering doing that).</p>
<p>And I totally agree with your observations here about &#8220;writing what you know&#8221;. Hell, I&#8217;ve never heard a satisfying explanation of what that even means. Like in my book: Am I supposed to murder someone so I can write about my MC murdering someone? Really? </p>
<p>All I can say is this: Write On, Friend!
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3915','Chris Long'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3915','Chris Long','Hi, Jimmy. I haven\'t seen any comments for a while on your posts and I just wanted to let you know that I, for one, very much enjoy reading what you put up here. I hope I\'m not the only one. So don\'t give up on it (if you were possibly considering doing that).\r\n\r\nAnd I totally agree with your observations here about \&quot;writing what you know\&quot;. Hell, I\'ve never heard a satisfying explanation of what that even means. Like in my book: Am I supposed to murder someone so I can write about my MC murdering someone? Really? \r\n\r\nAll I can say is this: Write On, Friend!'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sole Mates by Jimmy Ng</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/sole-mates/comment-page-1/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=1964#comment-3833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Mr. Chen.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3833&#039;,&#039;Jimmy Ng&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3833&#039;,&#039;Jimmy Ng&#039;,&#039;Thanks, Mr. Chen.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mr. Chen.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3833','Jimmy Ng'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3833','Jimmy Ng','Thanks, Mr. Chen.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sole Mates by Wolf Chen</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/sole-mates/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=1964#comment-3826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to hear that it didn&#039;t work out, Jimmy. You sure have a very healthy attitude about it. Oh, and even though I didn&#039;t know her, I can tell you with 100 percent confidence that it wasn&#039;t you, it was her. Good Luck.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3826&#039;,&#039;Wolf Chen&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3826&#039;,&#039;Wolf Chen&#039;,&#039;Sorry to hear that it didn\&#039;t work out, Jimmy. You sure have a very healthy attitude about it. Oh, and even though I didn\&#039;t know her, I can tell you with 100 percent confidence that it wasn\&#039;t you, it was her. Good Luck.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that it didn&#8217;t work out, Jimmy. You sure have a very healthy attitude about it. Oh, and even though I didn&#8217;t know her, I can tell you with 100 percent confidence that it wasn&#8217;t you, it was her. Good Luck.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3826','Wolf Chen'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3826','Wolf Chen','Sorry to hear that it didn\'t work out, Jimmy. You sure have a very healthy attitude about it. Oh, and even though I didn\'t know her, I can tell you with 100 percent confidence that it wasn\'t you, it was her. Good Luck.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lie To Me by Betta Fish Care</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/lie-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-3584</link>
		<dc:creator>Betta Fish Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=1777#comment-3584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Great stuff...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve been formerly watching your blogging site for the thirty day period or so and also have uncovered a great deal of reliable info. I&#039;m starting up to function my really have weblog even so It appears to be like like its very normal and I would lik...&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3584&#039;,&#039;Betta Fish Care&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3584&#039;,&#039;Betta Fish Care&#039;,&#039;&lt;strong&gt;Great stuff...&lt;\/strong&gt;\n\nI\&#039;ve been formerly watching your blogging site for the thirty day period or so and also have uncovered a great deal of reliable info. I\&#039;m starting up to function my really have weblog even so It appears to be like like its very normal and I would lik...&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great stuff&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been formerly watching your blogging site for the thirty day period or so and also have uncovered a great deal of reliable info. I&#8217;m starting up to function my really have weblog even so It appears to be like like its very normal and I would lik&#8230;
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3584','Betta Fish Care'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3584','Betta Fish Care','&lt;strong&gt;Great stuff...&lt;\/strong&gt;\n\nI\'ve been formerly watching your blogging site for the thirty day period or so and also have uncovered a great deal of reliable info. I\'m starting up to function my really have weblog even so It appears to be like like its very normal and I would lik...'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be Aware of What You Wish For by Linda Lee</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/be-aware-of-what-you-wish-for/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=1892#comment-3577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jimmy- Religions of the World-Winner! lol so great.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3577&#039;,&#039;Linda Lee&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3577&#039;,&#039;Linda Lee&#039;,&#039;Jimmy- Religions of the World-Winner! lol so great.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy- Religions of the World-Winner! lol so great.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3577','Linda Lee'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3577','Linda Lee','Jimmy- Religions of the World-Winner! lol so great.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More and More About Less and Less by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/more-and-more-about-less-and-less/comment-page-1/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=1806#comment-3187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m an athletic trainer and don&#039;t want to reveal which team I&#039;m on.  Aside the judgements placed on boh sides, this article does point out a truth.  An athlete needs different stimuli to push the envelope of progression.  We see this in mixed martial arts.  MMA fighters train with different coaches, disciplines, and training centers to widen their skill set, improve their reaction and speed, and push themselves passed their own comfort levels.  

Bill Walsh, former coach of the 49&#039;rs, ran plays in different orders to help his offense internalize, while forcing the defense to react and improvise in the moment.  

And since the human body needs exact training methods pertaining to the skills, working partner drills in a martial arts setting is crucial.  Assuming the author is telling the truth, given the reactions it seems to be, this school is lacking in more ways than one.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3187&#039;,&#039;Anonymous&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3187&#039;,&#039;Anonymous&#039;,&#039;I\&#039;m an athletic trainer and don\&#039;t want to reveal which team I\&#039;m on.  Aside the judgements placed on boh sides, this article does point out a truth.  An athlete needs different stimuli to push the envelope of progression.  We see this in mixed martial arts.  MMA fighters train with different coaches, disciplines, and training centers to widen their skill set, improve their reaction and speed, and push themselves passed their own comfort levels.  \r\n\r\nBill Walsh, former coach of the 49\&#039;rs, ran plays in different orders to help his offense internalize, while forcing the defense to react and improvise in the moment.  \r\n\r\nAnd since the human body needs exact training methods pertaining to the skills, working partner drills in a martial arts setting is crucial.  Assuming the author is telling the truth, given the reactions it seems to be, this school is lacking in more ways than one.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an athletic trainer and don&#8217;t want to reveal which team I&#8217;m on.  Aside the judgements placed on boh sides, this article does point out a truth.  An athlete needs different stimuli to push the envelope of progression.  We see this in mixed martial arts.  MMA fighters train with different coaches, disciplines, and training centers to widen their skill set, improve their reaction and speed, and push themselves passed their own comfort levels.  </p>
<p>Bill Walsh, former coach of the 49&#8242;rs, ran plays in different orders to help his offense internalize, while forcing the defense to react and improvise in the moment.  </p>
<p>And since the human body needs exact training methods pertaining to the skills, working partner drills in a martial arts setting is crucial.  Assuming the author is telling the truth, given the reactions it seems to be, this school is lacking in more ways than one.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3187','Anonymous'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3187','Anonymous','I\'m an athletic trainer and don\'t want to reveal which team I\'m on.  Aside the judgements placed on boh sides, this article does point out a truth.  An athlete needs different stimuli to push the envelope of progression.  We see this in mixed martial arts.  MMA fighters train with different coaches, disciplines, and training centers to widen their skill set, improve their reaction and speed, and push themselves passed their own comfort levels.  \r\n\r\nBill Walsh, former coach of the 49\'rs, ran plays in different orders to help his offense internalize, while forcing the defense to react and improvise in the moment.  \r\n\r\nAnd since the human body needs exact training methods pertaining to the skills, working partner drills in a martial arts setting is crucial.  Assuming the author is telling the truth, given the reactions it seems to be, this school is lacking in more ways than one.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More and More About Less and Less by Han</title>
		<link>http://7thprovince.com/more-and-more-about-less-and-less/comment-page-1/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator>Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 04:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://7thprovince.com/?p=1806#comment-3176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whys yous gotsa make fun of how I talk.  Check yo own grammar, fool.  But you right.  He never called them out.&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;3176&#039;,&#039;Han&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;3176&#039;,&#039;Han&#039;,&#039;Whys yous gotsa make fun of how I talk.  Check yo own grammar, fool.  But you right.  He never called them out.&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whys yous gotsa make fun of how I talk.  Check yo own grammar, fool.  But you right.  He never called them out.
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('3176','Han'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('3176','Han','Whys yous gotsa make fun of how I talk.  Check yo own grammar, fool.  But you right.  He never called them out.'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
